Last week, I received an email from the Authors Guild which struck a chord. The subject was royalties for electronic books, which, as AG correctly points out, have been dropping even as the market for ebooks is booming.
When I got my first publishing contract in 1997, the ebook split was 50 - 50. By 2006, when I signed my contract with Random House, the royalty was 25% of retail, and zero on deep discounts. I have no idea how much I lost through that arrangement.
What AG has done is to calculate what authors have lost. While publishers are not gaining as much as they did in the first heady days of ebook expansion (before Amazon forced them to lower their prices), they are still gaining - at the expense of authors. According to AG, authors are losing up to half of their ebook royalties.
Read it and weep... (or, alternatively, read it and self-publish)
____________________
Authors Guild, July 9, 2015
We announced our Fair Contract Initiative earlier this summer. Now our
first detailed analysis tackles today’s inadequate e-book royalties. At the
heart of our concern with the unfair industry-standard e-book royalty rate is
its failure to treat authors as full partners in the publishing enterprise.
This will be a resounding theme in our initiative; it’s what’s wrong with many
of the one-sided “standard” clauses we’ll be examining in future installments.
Traditionally, the author-publisher partnership was an equal
one. Authors earned around 50% of their books’ profits. That equal split is
reflected in the traditional hardcover royalty of 15% of list (cover price,
that is, not the much lower wholesale price), and in the 50-50 split of
publishers’ earnings from selling paperback, book club, or reprint rights.
Authors generally received an even larger share than the publisher for
non-print rights (such as stage and screen rights) and foreign rights.
But today’s standard contracts give authors just 25% of the
publisher’s “net receipts” (more or less what the publisher collects from a
book sale) for e-book royalties. That doesn’t look like a partnership to us.
We maintain that a 50-50 split in e-book profits is fair
because the traditional author-publisher relationship is essentially a joint
venture. The author writes the book, and by any fair measure the author’s
efforts represent most of the labor invested and most of the resulting value.
The publisher, like a venture capitalist, invests in the author’s work by
paying an advance so the author can make ends meet while the book gets
finished. Generally, the publisher also provides editing, marketing, packaging,
and distribution services. In return for fronting the financial risk and
providing these services, the publisher gets to share in the book’s profits.
Not a bad deal. This worked well enough throughout much of the twentieth
century: publishers prospered and authors had a decent shot at earning a
living.
How the e-book rate evolved
From the mid-1990s, when e-book provisions regularly began
appearing in contracts, until around 2004, e-royalties varied wildly. Many of
the e-rates at major publishing houses were shockingly low—less than 10% of net
receipts—and some were at 50%. Some standard contracts left them open to
negotiation. As the years passed, and especially between 2000 and 2004, many
publishers paid authors 50% of their net receipts from e-book sales, in keeping
with the idea that authors and publishers were equal partners in the book business.
In 2004, we saw a hint of things to come. Random House,
which had previously paid 50% of its revenues for e-book sales, anticipated the
coming boom in e-book sales and cut its e-rates significantly. Other publishers
followed, and gradually e-royalties began to coalesce around 25%. By 2010 it
was clear that publishers had successfully tipped the scales on the
longstanding partnership between author and publisher to achieve a 75-25
balance in their favor.
The lowball e-royalty was inequitable, but initially it
didn’t have much effect on authors’ bottom lines. As late as 2009, e-books
accounted for a paltry 3–5% of book sales. Authors and agents ought to have
pushed back, but with e-book sales so low it didn’t make much sense to risk the
chance of any individual book deal falling apart over e-royalties. We called
the 25% rate a “low-water mark.” We said, “Once the digital market gets large
enough, authors with strong sales records won’t put up with this: they’ll go
where they’ll once again be paid as full partners in the exploitation of their
creative work.”
E-books now represent 25–30% of all adult trade book sales,
but for the vast majority of authors the rate remains unchanged. If anything,
publishers have dug in their heels. Why? There’s a contractual roadblock, for
one: major book publishers have agreed to include “most favored nation” clauses
in thousands of existing contracts. These clauses require automatic adjustment
or renegotiation of e-book royalties if the publisher changes its standard
royalty rate, giving publishers a strong incentive to maintain the status quo.
And the increasing consolidation of the book industry has drastically reduced
competition among publishers, allowing them more than ever to hand authors
“take it or leave it” deals in the expectation that the author won’t find a
better offer.
The elephant in the room
And then there’s the elephant in the room: Amazon, which has
used its e-book dominance to demand steep discounts from publishers and drive
down the price of frontlist e-books, even selling them at a loss. As a result,
there’s simply not as much e-book revenue to split as there was in 2011when we
reported on the e-book royalty math. At that time, publishers made a killing on
frontlist e-book sales as compared to frontlist hardcover sales—at the author’s
expense—because, as compared to today, the price of e-books was relatively
high.
When we analyzed e-royalties for three books in the 2011
post, “E-Book Royalty Math: The House Always Wins,” we found
that every time an e-book was sold in place of a hardcover, the author’s take
decreased substantially, while the publisher’s take increased.
Since 2011, we have found that publishers’ e-gains have
diminished. But the author’s share has fallen even farther. Amazon has squeezed
the publishers, to be sure. The publishers have helped recoup their losses by
passing them on to their authors.
These were our calculations for several books in 2011. The
trend was obvious. Compared with hardcovers, each e-book sold brought big gains
to the publisher and sizable losses to the author when the author’s royalties
are compared to the publisher’s gross profit (income per copy minus expenses per
copy), calculated using industry-standard contract terms:
Author’s Royalty vs. Publisher’s Profit, 2011
The Help, by Kathryn Stockett
Author’s Standard Royalty: $3.75 hardcover; $2.28 e-book.
Author’s E-Loss = -39%
Publisher’s Margin: $4.75 hardcover; $6.32 e-book.
Publisher’s E-Gain = +33%
Hell’s Corner, by David Baldacci
Author’s Standard Royalty: $4.20 hardcover; $2.63 e-book.
Author’s E-Loss = -37%
Publisher’s Margin: $5.80 hardcover; $7.37 e-book.
Publisher’s E-Gain = +27%
Unbroken, by Laura Hillenbrand
Author’s Standard Royalty: $4.05 hardcover; $3.38 e-book.
Author’s E-Loss = -17%
Publisher’s Margin: $5.45 hardcover; $9.62 e-book.
Publisher’s E-Gain = +77%
What’s happening now? We ran the numbers again using the
following recent bestsellers. Because of lower e-book prices, the publishers
don’t do as well as they used to, though they still come out ahead when
consumers choose e-books over hardcovers. But authors fare worse than ever:
Author’s Royalty vs. Publisher’s Profit, 2015
All the Light We Cannot See, by Anthony Doer
Author’s Standard Royalty: $4.04 hardcover; $2.09 e-book.
Author’s E-Loss= -48%
Publisher’s Margin: $5.44 hardcover; $5.80 e-book.
Publisher’s E-Gain: +7%
Being Mortal, by Atul Gawande
Author’s Standard Royalty: $3.90 hardcover; $1.92 e-book.
Author’s E-Loss= -51%
Publisher’s Margin: $5.10 hardcover; $5.27 e-book.
Publisher’s E-Gain: +3.5%
A Spool of Blue Thread, by Anne Tyler
Author’s Standard Royalty: $3.89; $1.92 e-book.
Author’s E-Loss: -51%
Publisher’s Margin: $5.09 hardcover; $5.27 e-book.
Publisher’s E-Gain: +3.5%[1]
Exceptions to the rule
It’s time for a change. If the publishers won’t correct this
imbalance on their own, it will take a critical mass of authors and agents
willing to fight for a fair 50% e-book royalty. We hope that established
authors and, particularly, bestselling authors will start to push back and
stand up to publishers on the royalty rate—on behalf of all authors, as well as
themselves.
There have been cracks in some publishers’ façades. Some
bestselling authors have managed to obtain a 50% e-book split, though they’re
asked to sign non-disclosure agreements to keep these terms secret. We’ve also
heard of authors with strong sales histories negotiating 50-50 royalty splits
in exchange for foregoing an advance or getting a lower advance; or where the
50% rate kicks in only after a certain threshold level of sales. For instance,
a major romance publishing house has offered 50% royalties, but only after the
first 10,000 electronic copies—a high bar to clear in the current digital
climate. But overall, publishers’ apparent inflexibility on their standard
e-book royalty demonstrates their unwillingness to change it.
We know and respect the fact that publishers—especially in
this era of media consolidation—need to meet their bottom lines. But if
professional authors are going to continue to produce the sort of work
publishing houses are willing to stake their reputations on, those authors need
a fair share of the profits from their art and labor. In a time when electronic
books provide an increasing share of revenues at significantly lower production
and distribution costs, publishers’ e-book royalty practices need to change.
[1] In calculating these numbers and percentages for
hardcover editions, we made the following assumptions: (1) the publisher sells
at an average 50% discount to the wholesaler or retailer, (2) the royalty rate
is 15% of list price (as it is for most hardcover books, after 10,000 units are
sold), (3) the average marginal cost to manufacture the book and get it to the
store is $3, and (4) the return rate is 25% (a handy number—if one of four
books produced is returned, then the $3 marginal cost of producing the book is
spread over three other books, giving us a return cost of $1 per book). We also
rounded up retail list price a few pennies to give us easy figures to work
with.
Likewise, in calculating these numbers and percentages for
the 2015 set of e-books, we are assuming that under the agency model—which is
reportedly the new standard in the Big Five’s agreements with Amazon—the
online bookseller pays 70% of the retail list price of the e-book to the
publisher. The bookseller, acting as the publisher’s agent, sells the e-book at
the price established by the publisher. The unit costs to the publisher are
simply the author’s royalty and the encryption and transmission fees, for which
we deduct a generous 50 cents per unit.
The Authors Guild | 31 E 32nd St | Fl 7 | New York, NY 10016 | United States
Strange logic in this article. How can the author of this article know so much about the publishers' profit? The "assumptions" in footnote 1, do not apply to most book deals. Plus, they don't account for a nickel of development costs. (This can add up to tens of thousands of dollars, BEFORE they lay out the pages or turn on the press.) Then if you throw POD into the mix, the economics are very different.
ReplyDeleteThe Guild's fight for better contract terms, is exactly the same as the fast-food workers' demand for a minimum wage of $15 per hour. It does nothing to account for the individual skill and merit of each person.
My take on the AG situation: http://wordwisebooks.blogspot.com/2015/07/authors-guild-demands-more.html
ReplyDelete