I've been keeping tabs on the most recent Digital Book World/Writer's Digest survey, not just because I want to know what other writers are up to, but because I want the reassurance that we are all up to the same thing.
There is safety in numbers.
______________________________
DBW 2014: Survey Finds Most Authors Want to Earn More
Publishers Weekly, Jan 15, 2014
The Digital Book World/Writer's Digest 2014
survey, discussed at the organization's New York event this week, found
that, in spite of the growing popularity of self-publishing, many
authors would, given the chance, still opt for a traditional book deal.
Just over 9,200 authors responded to the survey, and they fall
into four categories: aspiring (not yet published in any manner);
self-published (have never worked with a traditional publisher);
traditionally published (have only been published by a traditional
house); and hybrid (have had experience self-publishing and have also
been published by a traditional house). The survey, which is available
for purchase at the DBW store, focuses on commercial fiction writers who
are not treating their writing as a full-time job, and would like to be
making more money from their writing.
Read the full article HERE.
Among some of the big picture takeaways from the survey are that,
despite some negative impressions of traditional publishing, it remains
the route many authors would like to pursue.
Although the sampled authors felt traditional publishing offers less creative freedom, what it provides in other areas--namely marketing, distribution and editorial support--is a positive that outweighs the negative.
Although the sampled authors felt traditional publishing offers less creative freedom, what it provides in other areas--namely marketing, distribution and editorial support--is a positive that outweighs the negative.
DBW found that the traditionally-published authors surveyed felt
traditional publishing offered "lackluster" experience relative to what
they hoped for, and expected.
Among hybrid
authors surveyed, DBW said they were showing a "pattern of movement"
from traditional houses to self-publishing. The DBW survey highlighted a
familiar tale of the traditionally-published author who, unhappy with
his or her treatment/sales/revenue, opts for self-publishing, which
offers a much higher royalty rate. Among these hybrid authors, there was
more satisfaction with self-publishing, and only 16.1% of this group,
DBW found, said they intended to go back to traditional publishing.
Most of the authors in the DBW sample who had been traditionally
published did not receive an advance, and almost all of the authors
interviewed identified advances as a benefit of traditional publishing.
Also, interestingly, DBW found that there was not a significant
discrepancy in sales among authors in the survey who self-published and
those who were traditionally published.
Overall, DBW found, these authors were not happy with their sales
period. As the survey notes: "Neither mode of publishing, it seems,
provided authors with what they hoped in terms of sales, earnings,
distribution, or marketing."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.